Vulnerability management services in India
We assess your web apps, APIs, mobile apps, cloud and network on a cycle you choose. We check every finding by hand, rank it by the risk in your own systems, and stay with it until a re-check shows the fix held.
What we assess
Every asset goes through one process, so each finding lands in one list and is ranked the same way. It is one part of our defensive cybersecurity services.
We check sign-in, sessions, input handling and access control against the OWASP guidance your scope names, such as a stated release of OWASP ASVS (Application Security Verification Standard). OWASP is an open application security community. Logged-in areas are covered too, with a test account for each role you provide.
Using at least two user roles you provide and the API's description documents, such as an OpenAPI file, we check whether a user can reach records, functions or fields meant for someone else. These are three risk categories in the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023): object-level, function-level and property-level authorization. A scanner that sees only one user cannot find them.
We check what the app stores, sends and is allowed to do on the phone, against OWASP MASVS (Mobile Application Security Verification Standard) and against what you declared to the App Store and Google Play. For flaws in the source rather than the build, secure code review reads the code itself.
Cloud and network. Cloud accounts, servers and network devices are covered through configuration evidence and authenticated scanning, which signs in with credentials you provide. Some weaknesses there are settings, not missing patches. For those, pair this work with a cloud security review for AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, and security posture assessment and hardening for servers, network devices and SaaS (software-as-a-service) tenants.
Fixed, not just listed
Many vulnerability management solutions stop at a scanner and a dashboard. That gives you a longer list, not safer systems. We stay with each finding until the fix is verified.
Where the fix belongs in the build pipeline, DevSecOps consulting can make the check part of every release.
Triage and prioritization
Scanner output is a list of candidates. Vulnerability triage turns it into facts your team can act on, ranked by risk rather than raw severity.
We confirm findings by hand from version, configuration and response evidence. Nothing is attacked to prove a point. If the evidence suggests a system may already be compromised, it goes straight to your incident response contacts instead of the queue.
The same weakness often shows up once per scanner and once per host. We merge it into one finding with every affected asset listed. False positives are closed with the reason written down, so the next scan doesn't reopen the argument.
A CVSS v4.0 base score (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) describes the vulnerability itself. It doesn't know which of your servers faces the internet or holds customer data. Each finding keeps its score, and the report says why it moved up or down.
Weaknesses that attackers are known to exploit go to the front of the queue. Many are listed in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog kept by CISA, the US cybersecurity agency. Where an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score exists, we record it as a second sign of likelihood. The 2025 audit policy of CERT-In (the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team) asks auditors for both: CVSS for severity and EPSS for likelihood.
Internet exposure, the data an asset holds and its business role decide what is patched first. A medium-severity flaw on an internet-facing payment service can outrank a critical one on an isolated test machine. Criticality comes from your inventory and is agreed with you, not guessed.
Sometimes the vendor has no fix yet, or the change window is weeks away. We then record temporary safeguards (compensating controls) and hardening, each with an expiry date. Your own detection can watch the gap in the meantime; threat detection support helps your team set that up.
How we work
A vulnerability list is only as complete as the list of assets behind it.
Scope comes from your asset inventory. Assets found along the way are reported, and added once you confirm they are yours.
A regular cycle you choose, written into the scope so nobody has to remember it. A new release, a new asset or an advisory that affects your stack also triggers a check of what changed.
An external scan sees what the internet sees. Authenticated scanning also finds missing patches, outdated libraries and weak settings.
We check each finding by hand and rank it by risk.
We track each fix against the owner and target date you set.
We run the same check again, and the finding closes only when it passes.
What you receive
It is written for two readers: the engineer who fixes a finding and the manager who has to explain the backlog.
What was assessed, when, with which credentials, and what could not be reached. An asset that was offline or refused a login is listed as not assessed, so a clean result is never read as more than it was.
Each finding with its evidence, the affected assets, a CVSS v4.0 score with its vector, the reason for its priority, a reference that describes the fix and its status: open, fixed and re-verified, or accepted with an expiry date. Findings we could not confirm are kept in a separate list, with what would be needed to confirm them.
The fixes in priority order, with owners and target dates, then a record of re-verification: what was fixed, when it was checked and what the check showed.
If you are comparing vulnerability management solutions, ask each provider to show you that re-verification record first.
Compliance
The same records can serve an assessor, as long as they are kept with that use in mind from the start.
PCI DSS v4.0.1, the card payment security standard, asks in requirement 11.3.1 for internal vulnerability scans at least once every three months, with rescans to confirm that high-risk and critical findings were resolved. Evidence from this service is organized to support it. External scans, which requirement 11.3.2 assigns to an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV), stay with the ASV you choose. See PCI DSS compliance services.
The same records support ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A control 8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities. It asks that vulnerability information is obtained, exposure is evaluated and appropriate measures are taken. An auditor can follow one finding from discovery to re-verification. See ISO 27001 consulting.
India's Cyber Security Audit Baseline Requirements list vulnerability assessment, with corrective action, as something the organization does on a continuous basis (marker pro.11).
What this work does not include. SecWiz is not a CERT-In empanelled auditing organization, and this service is not an audit. Where a framework requires testing SecWiz does not perform, we prepare the evidence and coordinate with the independent provider you choose.
Asset scope. CERT-In's audit policy of July 2025 states at 13.1.1(c) that the scope must be derived from the consolidated and updated asset inventory.
Authenticated scanning. For internal scans, PCI DSS makes the same distinction between authenticated and unauthenticated scanning in requirement 11.3.1.2.
A vulnerability assessment is one look at a set of assets. Vulnerability management is the continuous cycle around it: inventory, assessment, triage, prioritization, remediation and re-verification.
Because a scan describes one day. Assets, code and published advisories keep changing, so its results go stale. Continuous vulnerability management keeps the inventory current, reassesses what changed and checks that each fix held. It runs on a cycle you choose, with an extra check after a launch or a significant change, and its records are the evidence a customer or regulator asks for.
We confirm findings from version, configuration and response evidence, and from authenticated checks agreed with your team, without exploitation. Anything that cannot be confirmed safely is reported as unconfirmed, with the reason.
By risk rather than raw severity: whether the vulnerability is known to be exploited in the wild, whether the asset is exposed to the internet, what data it holds and whether a compensating control exists.
Yes. Web applications, APIs and mobile apps are assessed alongside servers, cloud accounts and network devices, and all findings go into one prioritized remediation plan.
We record the exception with a justification, an approver and an expiry date, and recommend compensating controls or hardening until the fix can ship.
Not always. Some frameworks require testing that SecWiz does not perform. In that case we prepare the evidence and coordinate with the independent provider you choose.
Let's talk
Send the asset list you have, even if you know it is incomplete, and tell us which systems matter most. We will propose a scope and a cadence. We reply within one working day.