Find weaknesses
We check your systems inside an agreed scope, the way a careful reviewer would, and confirm every finding by hand.
Defensive cybersecurity services in India
Find the weak spots in your systems — and get them fixed.
We check your web apps, mobile apps, APIs, networks and cloud for weaknesses, confirm every finding by hand, and help your team fix what matters most. We also make sure an intrusion would show up in your logs. Checking your fixes is included.
- Every finding confirmed by a person
- Fix checks included
- We reply within one working day.
- OWASP ASVS
- OWASP MASVS
- CIS Benchmarks
- CVSS v4.0
- NIST CSF 2.0
In brief
- What it is
- Ongoing defensive security. We find what is exposed, confirm what is real, and help you fix and harden it in order of risk.
- Why it matters
- A one-off scan only shows a single day. Customers, auditors and regulators want proof that weaknesses are found and fixed as you go.
- What you get
- A clear report with evidence and a specific fix for every finding, help with the fixes, and a re-check that shows each one is closed.
What we do
Find weaknesses, fix them, and spot trouble early.
Twelve services in three simple groups. Pick one to see how we scope and run it, or start with a call and we'll suggest the smallest piece of work that answers your question.
Fix and harden
We rank what we found by real risk, help your team close it, and tighten the settings that let it happen.
Detect and respond
We make sure an intrusion would show up in your logs, and that your people know exactly what to do next.
Need someone to own security with you over time? See vCISO services and managed security and compliance.
Two different jobs
Why a one-off scan is not enough.
A vulnerability scan shows what was exposed on the day it ran. Defensive work is everything around it: knowing which systems you run, confirming which findings are real, fixing and hardening in order of risk, checking that each fix held, and making sure an intrusion would show up in your logs.
Regulators see it the same way. India's Cyber Security Audit Baseline Requirements treat vulnerability assessment, with corrective action, as continuous work. Our vulnerability management service runs that cycle for you, from asset inventory to fix checks.
When a one-off scan falls short
- Before a launch. We assess the release you're about to ship, and check the fixes before it goes live.
- After a big change. A new feature, integration or hosting setup can expose systems the last check never saw.
- When someone asks for proof. Customers and regulators often want a recent report and evidence that the findings were fixed.
If your product includes a language model or an AI agent, a standard assessment won't cover those parts. They need LLM security testing, which follows its own method.
Find the right service
Start with the question you need answered.
A tender usually names a system, such as a web app or a network. The question behind it decides which piece of work you actually need.
- Which of our open findings should we fix first, and who checks that the fix held?Vulnerability management
- Has anyone compared our settings with a named benchmark, one setting at a time?Posture assessment
- Has anyone actually read our cloud setup, and against which benchmark?Cloud security review
- Would our logs show an intrusion, and would the alert reach someone who acts on it?Threat detection
- Is there a defending team on our side, and has it rehearsed the plan?Blue Team exercises
- Is reading our code worth it for the weaknesses we care about?Secure code review
- Could the assessment we booked even find a design flaw?Threat modeling
- Who is allowed to skip the security checks in our release pipeline?DevSecOps consulting
- Our yearly training module is done. Is that what the auditor wants?Awareness training
- Our regulator says to choose an architecture method but won't say which one.Security consulting
- What must be ready before CERT-In's six-hour reporting clock starts, and who responds?Incident response
How we work
Five clear steps, agreed in writing first.
The scope we agree in step one shapes everything after it, so nothing happens on your systems that you haven't signed off.
Scoping
We agree what's in, what's out, what we must not disturb, and who on your side we call if something behaves unexpectedly. The scope and our access are in writing before anyone touches anything.
Asset inventory
We check the list of systems you gave us against what is actually running, which is often more: forgotten test sites, extra subdomains or exposed admin pages. Each one goes on the list.
Assessment and triage
Scanning and configuration review with the tools in our technology stack. A person then confirms each finding, closes false alarms with a reason, and ranks the rest by risk, starting with weaknesses known to be exploited.
Reporting
Every finding gets evidence, a CVSS v4.0 score, its root cause, a priority and a specific fix or hardening step.
Fix check
You fix, we verify. Checking your fixes is included, because a report nobody has followed up is hard to show anyone.
What you can hold us to
Named standards, real findings, fixes you can use.
Named standards in every report
OWASP ASVS and MASVS for applications, CIS Benchmarks for settings, NIST CSF 2.0 for program structure, and CVSS v4.0 plus known-exploited status for priorities. Every report says which method it followed.
Findings confirmed by hand
Scanners miss some issues and report others that aren't there. A person confirms each finding and checks the things a scanner can't judge, such as who can see whose data. If a scan is all you need, a scanner will cost you less.
Fixes you can act on
Every issue comes with steps a developer can follow to reproduce it and a specific fix for your system. We also tell you which findings aren't worth your time.
What this work does not include. None of our assessments is an audit, and none produces a certificate. Audits and certificates come from an accredited or empanelled body, which we are not.
FAQ
Questions about defensive cybersecurity.
Scope, timing, reports and the risk to your systems. For anything else, ask us directly.
Continuous vulnerability management and assessment for web applications, mobile apps, APIs, networks and cloud configurations; security posture assessment and hardening; threat detection support and SOC readiness; Blue Team exercises and incident response readiness; plus secure code review, threat modeling, DevSecOps and security awareness training. Engineering teams in India usually bring us in before an external audit or a launch. We work to OWASP ASVS and MASVS for applications, CIS Benchmarks for configuration, NIST CSF 2.0 for program structure, and CVSS v4.0 plus known-exploited status for prioritization.
It depends on the scope, which is why scoping comes first. You get the timeline and the price before you commit, and checking your fixes is already included.
A report that writes up each finding on its own, with evidence, reproduction steps, a CVSS v4.0 score, the root cause, a priority and a specific fix. The executive summary says plainly which findings don't matter in your environment. Once you've fixed things, we verify the fixes, and that's included.
Yes, with a separate methodology. Prompt injection, agent tool misuse and retrieval permission failures don't show up in a conventional web assessment, because it has no reason to look for them. That work sits under AI security.
We plan around it. The scope is agreed in writing first: what's in, what's off limits, when scans and checks may run, and who to call straight away if something behaves unexpectedly. Findings are confirmed from evidence rather than by attacking your systems, and nothing that could disrupt a service runs without your written agreement.
Yes. We can hand the report to your developers and answer their questions, or do the fixes ourselves where it's code we can work in. Checking the fixes is included either way.
Standards and sources
- OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)
- Center for Internet Security, CIS Benchmarks
- CISA, Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, February 2024
- FIRST, Common Vulnerability Scoring System version 4.0 (CVSS v4.0)
- National Security Council Secretariat, Cyber Security Audit Baseline Requirements, NSCS-46-16 Rev 1.0, October 2020 (marker pro.11)
- CERT-In Directions under section 70B(6) of the IT Act, 2000, 28 April 2022 (incident reporting within six hours)
Facts and dates last checked 25 September 2026.
Let's talk
Tell us what needs defending.
List the systems and any deadline. After a short scoping call you get a written scope and price, or a suggestion for a smaller piece of work if that would answer your question. We reply within one working day.